The Official Stance on AI Content
The published position of the major search engines: reward high-quality content produced for people, irrespective of the method used to produce it.
Analogy Mental model
A games committee announcing that it does not care whether an athlete trained with a steel bar or a biomechanical chamber. On the day, what counts is the time, and whether anything prohibited was taken.
In practice What you actually do
The sentence to remember is that quality is rewarded however it is produced. The distinction being drawn is between content made for people and content made to manipulate rankings, not between typed by hand and drafted with assistance.
Where people get burned Pitfalls
The useful question is not whether assistance will cause a penalty. It is whether the person searching this term, exhausted and pressed for time, will finish the page better off or three minutes poorer. That answer is available before publishing, without asking anyone.
This entry was written in English from the Chinese original, not machine-translated. Read the Chinese version →