Skip to content

Chapter 6: Link Building and Authority

Entries #266–#315 · 50 entries · 3 sections · Chinese edition
Why this chapter exists Links remain the closest thing search has to a reputation system, but the currency has changed. This chapter covers prospecting, outreach, digital PR, and how to judge whether a link is worth the effort.

6.1 Link basics, anchor mix and attributes

15 entries

6.2 How authority flows and how it is measured

15 entries

6.3 White-hat outreach, digital PR and clean-up

20 entries

Chapter SOP and interview questions

White-hat outreach SOP, from asset to follow-up

  1. Build something worth linking to first. A depth guide, an original dataset, a free tool, a benchmark nobody has published. A product page will not earn editorial links, no matter how good the email is.
  2. Build a prospect list on evidence. Use Ahrefs or Semrush to find sites that published on the topic in the last twelve months, sit in a realistic authority band, and carry real organic traffic. Recency matters — a post from 2021 does not need your update.
  3. Find the person, not the inbox. Never send to info@. Locate the author or the editor by name and verify the address before sending. An unverified list wastes the only asset you cannot resupply: attention.
  4. Write a pitch that earns the open.
    • Subject: short and specific — “a data point for your [topic] guide”, not “collaboration opportunity”.
    • First line: prove you read the piece. Quote a specific claim from it.
    • Middle: state the value in one sentence — what you have that they do not, and where it fits in their article.
    • Close: a low-friction ask. “Would it help if I sent it over?” converts better than “please link to us”.
  5. Follow up twice, then stop. One short nudge after four days, one final after five more. Two unanswered follow-ups means no.
  6. Track reply rate, not send volume. A hundred pitches with no replies is a message problem. Ten pitches with three replies and one link is a system that works; scale that.

Interview questions and answer frameworks

Q1: A brand-new site, zero authority, first three months — how do you build links from nothing?

Framework: Sequence by risk, not by ambition. Month one — legitimacy. Claim and complete the profiles that exist for entities like yours: the review and directory sites your buyers actually check, the company profiles, the community where your category is discussed. These links are easy, safe and unglamorous, and they give the domain a baseline of trust. Month two — reactive. Set up expert-quote services and answer journalist requests in your niche; publish two or three genuinely useful assets that make a “resource page” inclusion plausible, and ask for those inclusions politely. Month three — proactive. Publish one original piece of research as link bait, then run targeted outreach against the pillar pages you want to rank. Say the constraint out loud: at zero authority, relevance beats volume, and one link from a site your buyers read is worth more than twenty from directories nobody opens.

Q2: How do you judge whether a link is high quality?

Framework: Five dimensions, in priority order. Relevance — does the linking site cover your subject, and does the specific page’s context make the link sensible? Real traffic — does the domain have organic search traffic, or is it a high-authority shell with no readers? Authority and history — a stable link profile and clean outbound neighbourhood matter more than a single score. Placement — in-body editorial links carry weight; footer, sidebar and author-bio links mostly do not, and paid or exchanged links should be disclosed as such. Anchor naturalness — does the sentence still read correctly if you delete the link? If not, the anchor is doing SEO work rather than describing the destination, and that is a pattern engines are good at spotting.

Q3: What do you do when a competitor is buying links and outranking you?

Framework: Separate the two questions — what they are doing, and what you are willing to do. Short term, you cannot outspend a link buyer on links, so do not try; compete on the surfaces where links are not the deciding factor: query coverage, page format, freshness, brand demand, and the entity signals that make you the obvious answer. Medium term, document the pattern if it is genuinely manipulative and let the platform handle it — but do not build a strategy around a competitor getting penalised, because most do not. Long term, the assets you build now keep working after a link-buying campaign stops.

Q4: How do you evaluate whether link building paid off?

Framework: Three layers, and be clear which one you are claiming. Leading indicators — placements, referring domains by relevance tier, and whether target pages gained links at all. Ranking movement — position change on the specific queries those pages target, compared against a control set of pages you did not touch. Business outcome — organic sessions and conversions on the linked pages, with a caveat about attribution. If you cannot show a control set, say so; a chart that goes up after work began is not evidence that the work caused it.